<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kiss and make up</title>
	<link>http://www.globalcommunitytribunal.com/2007/12/30/kiss-and-make-up/</link>
	<description>Justice for the People by the People</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.globalcommunitytribunal.com/2007/12/30/kiss-and-make-up/#comment-497</link>
		<author>admin</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalcommunitytribunal.com/2007/12/30/kiss-and-make-up/#comment-497</guid>
		<description>Hi Arnold, As was indicated I could only get hold of the initial Bill and accepted that, except for a few improvements, that would be the draft finally approved in parliament. I'm used to loosing arguments with my wife. That makes it easier for me to admit that were right. I now totally agree with you that the wording is totally insane. JCG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Arnold, As was indicated I could only get hold of the initial Bill and accepted that, except for a few improvements, that would be the draft finally approved in parliament. I&#8217;m used to loosing arguments with my wife. That makes it easier for me to admit that were right. I now totally agree with you that the wording is totally insane. JCG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnold</title>
		<link>http://www.globalcommunitytribunal.com/2007/12/30/kiss-and-make-up/#comment-486</link>
		<author>Arnold</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.globalcommunitytribunal.com/2007/12/30/kiss-and-make-up/#comment-486</guid>
		<description>The actual act in question is the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act.

This act states that a person who commits an act of sexual violation with a child is, despite the consent of such a child to the commission of such an act, guilty of the offence of having committed an act of consensual sexual violation with a child.

In the same act the term 'sexual violation' is defined amongst other things to be, direct or indirect contact between the mouth of one person and the mouth of another person.

This is what all the debate among the teenagers is all about.

http://www.doj.gov.za/legislation/acts/acts/2007-32.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The actual act in question is the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act.</p>
<p>This act states that a person who commits an act of sexual violation with a child is, despite the consent of such a child to the commission of such an act, guilty of the offence of having committed an act of consensual sexual violation with a child.</p>
<p>In the same act the term &#8217;sexual violation&#8217; is defined amongst other things to be, direct or indirect contact between the mouth of one person and the mouth of another person.</p>
<p>This is what all the debate among the teenagers is all about.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.doj.gov.za/legislation/acts/acts/2007-32.pdf" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.doj.gov.za');">http://www.doj.gov.za/legislation/acts/acts/2007-32.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
